NVIDIA Quadro K420 versus NVIDIA Quadro 600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K420 and NVIDIA Quadro 600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K420
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 876 MHz versus 640 MHz
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 14.02 GTexel / s versus 10.24 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 96
- Environ 37% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 336.4 gflops versus 245.76 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1782 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 733 versus 526
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 versus 232
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6 versus 5.617
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.365 versus 9.023
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.75 versus 16.137
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1245 versus 899
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1245 versus 899
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 13 December 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 876 MHz versus 640 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.02 GTexel / s versus 10.24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 336.4 gflops versus 245.76 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 733 versus 526 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 versus 232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6 versus 5.617 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 versus 185.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.365 versus 9.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.75 versus 16.137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 versus 899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 versus 899 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 600
- Environ 3% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 41 Watt
- 1024x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2100 versus 1843
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.526 versus 0.433
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1255 versus 598
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2037 versus 1241
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1255 versus 598
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2037 versus 1241
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 41 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2100 versus 1843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.526 versus 0.433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1255 versus 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 versus 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1255 versus 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 versus 1241 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K420
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 733 | 526 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | 232 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1843 | 2100 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6 | 5.617 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 | 185.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.433 | 0.526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.365 | 9.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.75 | 16.137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 | 899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 598 | 1255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1241 | 2037 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 | 899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 598 | 1255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1241 | 2037 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 13 December 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $96.67 | $179 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1467 | 1471 |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | $299 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.27 | 2.80 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 876 MHz | 640 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 336.4 gflops | 245.76 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.02 GTexel / s | 10.24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 160 mm | 168 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB / 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | DDR3 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K420 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 620i
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6530D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 410
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5300
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M335DX
