NVIDIA Quadro M1000M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 993 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1072 MHz versus 888 MHz
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 130 Watt
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 versus 32.718
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 versus 67.697
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3665
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3325
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3665
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3325
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 22 August 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1072 MHz versus 888 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 130 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 versus 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 versus 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 85.25 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 512
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,046 gflops versus 1,017 gflops
- 768x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1536 MB versus 2 GB / 4 GB
- Environ 12% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 versus 721.18
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 versus 3.056
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 versus 42.938
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 versus 4196
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 versus 4196
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops versus 1,017 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1536 MB versus 2 GB / 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 versus 721.18 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 versus 3.056 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 versus 42.938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 versus 4196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 versus 4196 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2854 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | 1021.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | 3.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | 56.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 | 22 August 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 848 | 850 |
| Prix maintenant | $203.37 | |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1072 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,017 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1152 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB / 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro M1000M avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
ATIRadeon X300
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000M
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
