NVIDIA Quadro M5000M versus AMD Radeon R9 285

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M5000M and AMD Radeon R9 285 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

versus

AMD Radeon R9 285

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 975 MHz versus 918 MHz
Environ 90% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 190 Watt
4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6926 versus 6680
Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 95.613 versus 72.799
Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.869 versus 6.369
Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9399 versus 6474
Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 3043
Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 2782
Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9399 versus 6474
Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 3043
Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 2782

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	18 August 2015 versus 2 September 2014
Vitesse du noyau	975 MHz versus 918 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt versus 190 Watt
Taille de mémore maximale	8 GB versus 2 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	6926 versus 6680
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	95.613 versus 72.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.869 versus 6.369
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9399 versus 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 versus 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339 versus 2782
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9399 versus 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 versus 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339 versus 2782

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 285

Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 102.8 GTexel / s versus 93.6 GTexel / s
Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1,536
Environ 10% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,290 gflops versus 2,995 gflops
Environ 10% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 5012 MHz
Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 versus 478
Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.632 versus 1341.18
Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.954 versus 83.683
Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 391.399 versus 366.321

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	102.8 GTexel / s versus 93.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 versus 1,536
Performance á point flottant	3,290 gflops versus 2,995 gflops
Vitesse de mémoire	5500 MHz versus 5012 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	597 versus 478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.632 versus 1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	91.954 versus 83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	391.399 versus 366.321

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6926

6680

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

478

597

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

95.613

72.799

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1341.18

1474.632

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.869

6.369

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

83.683

91.954

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

366.321

391.399

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9399

6474

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

3043

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3339

2782

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9399

6474

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

3043

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3339

2782

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M	AMD Radeon R9 285
PassMark - G3D Mark	6926	6680
PassMark - G2D Mark	478	597
Geekbench - OpenCL	22089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	95.613	72.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1341.18	1474.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.869	6.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	83.683	91.954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	366.321	391.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9399	6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685	3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339	2782
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9399	6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685	3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339	2782
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	2778

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M	AMD Radeon R9 285
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Nom de code	GM204	Tonga
Date de sortie	18 August 2015	2 September 2014
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	449	445
Genre	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$249
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1051 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	975 MHz	918 MHz
Performance á point flottant	2,995 gflops	3,290 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1,536	1792
Taux de remplissage de la texture	93.6 GTexel / s	102.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	190 Watt
Compte de transistor	5,200 million	5,000 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Port	1.2
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Taille du laptop	large
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	2x 6-pin
Longeur		221 mm
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	8 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	160 GB / s	176.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 Bit	256 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz	5500 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)