NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus AMD FirePro W4100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and AMD FirePro W4100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 630 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 46.56 GTexel / s versus 20.16 GTexel / s
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,490 gflops versus 645.1 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 versus 1504
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 453
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 versus 5447
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 versus 15.65
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 versus 538.848
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 versus 1.631
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 31.533
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 versus 75.309
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 versus 1951
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 3399
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 1620
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 versus 1951
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 3399
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 1620
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 13 August 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 630 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s versus 20.16 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops versus 645.1 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 versus 1504 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 453 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 versus 5447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 versus 15.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 versus 538.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 versus 1.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 31.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 versus 75.309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 versus 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 1620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 versus 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 1620 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 1504 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 453 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 5447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 15.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 538.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 1.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 31.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 75.309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 1620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 1620 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD FirePro W4100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP107 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 13 August 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 965 |
| Prix maintenant | $176.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 630 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 645.1 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 20.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 171 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Low Profile / Half Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P620 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
