NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus AMD FirePro W9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD FirePro W9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 930 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 163.7 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 750 Watt
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85474 versus 43046
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 versus 106.585
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3403.106 versus 1878.403
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.719 versus 9.751
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.919 versus 82.208
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1010.818 versus 511.115
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 9143
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 9143
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 26 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 930 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 750 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85474 versus 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 versus 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 versus 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 versus 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 versus 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 versus 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 9143 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9100
- Environ 22% de pipelines plus haut: 2816 versus 2304
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 versus 3714
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 versus 3359
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 versus 3714
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 versus 3359
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2816 versus 2304 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85474 | 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 32085 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7987 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Hawaii |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 26 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 193 | 189 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 6,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,238 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 275 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A60
