NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1035 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3652
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1035 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3652 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 705
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 14832
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 19565
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 19565
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 14832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 19565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 19565 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 869 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 19370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3652 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 175 | 103 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1035 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
