NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 versus AMD FirePro W9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD FirePro W9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 930 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 750 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 7987
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 752
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137262 versus 43046
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 106.585
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 1878.403
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 9.751
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 82.208
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 511.115
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 9143
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 9143
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 26 March 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 930 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 750 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 7987 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 versus 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 9143 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9100
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 versus 3652
- 9.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 versus 3290
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 versus 3652
- 9.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 versus 3290
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 versus 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 versus 3290 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD FirePro W9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | 7987 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | 752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 | 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 32085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 32085 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | TU102 | Hawaii |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 26 March 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 103 | 189 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 930 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 750 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 6,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,238 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2816 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 163.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 275 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 512 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |