NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 versus NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA TITAN V pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 8.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1700 MHz
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 270.561
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 3583.136
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 30.857
- 10.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 20.669
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1504.373
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 15401
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 15401
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 7 December 2017 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1700 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 15401 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN V
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1455 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 versus 19370
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 versus 137748
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3652
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3652
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 versus 3290
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19884 versus 19370 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150662 versus 137748 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 versus 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 versus 3290 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | 19884 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | 868 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 | 150662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 13111 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Nom de code | TU102 | GV100 |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 7 December 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | $2,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 103 | 149 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops | |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 652.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 3072 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 |