NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 70% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 926 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1206 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 114.2 GTexel/s versus 154.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 21% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6600 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 versus 33718
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 1674
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 1674
- 4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 versus 839
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 4 August 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 926 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1206 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 114.2 GTexel/s versus 154.4 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 versus 33718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 1674 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 versus 839 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 1024
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7977 versus 7235
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 versus 436
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 9313
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 9313
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1024 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7977 versus 7235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 versus 436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 9313 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7235 | 7977 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 436 | 724 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 33718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1674 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 839 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | TU117 | Ellesmere |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 4 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 365 | 395 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1206 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 114.2 GTexel/s | 154.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 5,700 million |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
ATIFireGL V8600
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 480
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
