NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon R9 390X

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

versus

AMD Radeon R9 390X

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Environ 73% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1050 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 145.2 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 95 Watt versus 275 Watt
Environ 43% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) versus 1050 MHz
Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9765 versus 9363
Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 versus 114.288
Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 versus 10.947
Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 versus 118.411
Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 versus 683.568
Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 versus 11675
Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 versus 11675

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	1815 MHz versus 1050 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	145.2 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
Processus de fabrication	8 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt versus 275 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) versus 1050 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	9765 versus 9363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	202.984 versus 114.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.498 versus 10.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	151.433 versus 118.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	729.947 versus 683.568
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12750 versus 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708 versus 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 versus 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12750 versus 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708 versus 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 versus 3350

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X

Environ 10% de pipelines plus haut: 2816 versus 2560
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 versus 493
Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 versus 2138.158

Caractéristiques
Pipelines	2816 versus 2560
Taille de mémore maximale	8 GB versus 4 GB
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	819 versus 493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2911.861 versus 2138.158

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9765

9363

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

493

819

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

202.984

114.288

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2138.158

2911.861

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.498

10.947

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

151.433

118.411

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

729.947

683.568

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12750

11675

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3706

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12750

11675

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3706

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3350

Nom	NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 390X
PassMark - G3D Mark	9765	9363
PassMark - G2D Mark	493	819
Geekbench - OpenCL	56688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	202.984	114.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2138.158	2911.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.498	10.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	151.433	118.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	729.947	683.568
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12750	11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12750	11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4242

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 390X
Essentiel
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 2.0
Nom de code	GA106	Grenada
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	272	269
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Date de sortie		18 June 2015
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$429
Genre		Desktop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1815 MHz	1050 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	735 MHz
Processus de fabrication	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	145.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	9.293 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	9.293 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	2816
Pixel fill rate	87.12 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	145.2 GTexel/s	184.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt	275 Watt
Compte de transistor	13250 million	6,200 million
Unités de Compute		44
Performance á point flottant		5,914 gflops
Stream Processors		2816
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
HDMI
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity		6
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Soutien de bus		PCIe 3.0
Longeur		275 mm
Soutien API
DirectX	12.2	12
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Mantle
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	192 GB/s	384 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 bit	512 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	1050 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	GDDR5
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM)
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore