NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1404 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9903 versus 9078
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 56602 versus 36659
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1404 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 versus 9078 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 versus 36659 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- Environ 55% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1139 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 95 Watt
- 4.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7012 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 488
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13448 versus 12750
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13448 versus 12750
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1139 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 95 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 versus 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 versus 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 | 9078 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 | 36659 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GA106 | GP104 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 274 | 273 |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2018 | |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1139 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 7,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
