NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX 590
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 590 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 84% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 95 Watt versus 175 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9903 versus 9390
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 56602 versus 45611
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 versus 137.469
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 versus 2083.862
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 versus 12.352
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 versus 139.477
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt versus 175 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 versus 9390 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 versus 45611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 versus 137.469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 versus 2083.862 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 versus 12.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 versus 139.477 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1469 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 53% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 222.48 GTexel/s versus 145.2 GTexel/s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 5.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 versus 488
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 versus 729.947
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 versus 12750
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 versus 12750
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s versus 145.2 GTexel/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 versus 488 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 versus 729.947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 versus 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 versus 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 | 9390 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 789 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 | 45611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 137.469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 2083.862 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 12.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 139.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 762.142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 13383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 13383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4758 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | GA106 | Polaris 30 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 274 | 271 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1469 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 49.54 GP/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s | 222.48 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 5,700 million |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
