NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Environ 75% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- Environ 75% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 145.2 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 versus 2082.931
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 versus 134.68
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 versus 599.217
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 versus 2082.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 versus 134.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 versus 599.217 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 95 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10129 versus 9899
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 versus 486
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57800 versus 56580
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 versus 202.984
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 versus 12750
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 versus 12750
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 95 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10129 versus 9899 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 versus 486 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57800 versus 56580 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 versus 202.984 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 versus 16.498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 versus 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 versus 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9899 | 10129 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 486 | 497 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56580 | 57800 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 229.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 2082.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 16.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 134.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 599.217 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5443 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA106 | GA106 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 283 | 264 |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | |
| Genre | Laptop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 12000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Facteur de forme | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
