NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Environ 75% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- Environ 75% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 145.2 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 versus 200.776
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 versus 1938.08
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 versus 15.298
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 versus 108.443
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 versus 568.183
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 versus 200.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 versus 1938.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 versus 15.298 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 versus 108.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 versus 568.183 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 95 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10165 versus 9962
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 versus 476
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57389 versus 56966
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 versus 12750
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 versus 12750
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 95 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10165 versus 9962 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 versus 476 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57389 versus 56966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 versus 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 versus 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9962 | 10165 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 497 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56966 | 57389 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 200.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 1938.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 15.298 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 108.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 568.183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5393 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA106 | GA106 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 267 | 268 |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | |
| Genre | Laptop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 12000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Facteur de forme | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
