NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1683 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 145.2 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1920
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 58% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 95 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 187.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 56817 versus 47301
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 versus 150.951
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 versus 1718.593
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 versus 12.283
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 versus 28.289
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 versus 710.366
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1683 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1920 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) versus 8 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 56817 versus 47301 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 versus 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 versus 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 versus 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 versus 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 versus 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 735 MHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13498 versus 9934
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 versus 481
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 versus 12750
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 versus 12750
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13498 versus 9934 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 versus 481 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 versus 12750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 versus 12750 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9934 | 13498 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 481 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 56817 | 47301 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA106 | GP104 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 282 | 284 |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2016 | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $379 | |
Prix maintenant | $359.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |