NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1785 MHz
- Environ 82% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1408
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 32% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 95 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 versus 187.131
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 versus 15.882
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 versus 117.673
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1785 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1408 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt versus 125 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 versus 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 versus 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 versus 117.673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 157.1 GTexel/s versus 145.2 GTexel/s
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12712 versus 9765
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 804 versus 493
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62641 versus 56688
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 versus 2138.158
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 versus 729.947
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 12750
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 12750
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s versus 145.2 GTexel/s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 versus 9765 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 versus 493 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 versus 56688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 versus 2138.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 versus 729.947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 12750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 12750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3708 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 | 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 804 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 | 62641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA106 | TU116 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 272 | 223 |
Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 6600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 192 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |