NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1785 MHz
- Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 187.131
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 15.882
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 117.673
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1785 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1408 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 187.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 15.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 117.673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12712 vs 9765
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 804 vs 493
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62641 vs 56688
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 2138.158
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 vs 729.947
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 12750
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 vs 9765 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 vs 493 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 vs 56688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 vs 2138.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 vs 729.947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3708 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 | 12712 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 804 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 | 62641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 187.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 2548.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 15.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 117.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 901.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 17812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 17812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA106 | TU116 |
| Place in performance rating | 272 | 223 |
| Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1408 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
