NVIDIA RTX A5000 versus NVIDIA RTX A4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA RTX A4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Environ 59% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1170 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 45% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 433.9 GTexel/s versus 299.5 GTexel/s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 8192 versus 6144
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 24 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22848 versus 19406
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1036 versus 994
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 154601 versus 122380
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 versus 420.465
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 versus 4156.52
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 versus 32.297
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 versus 162.131
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 versus 1895.111
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 versus 22050
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 versus 22050
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s versus 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 8192 versus 6144 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 16 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22848 versus 19406 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1036 versus 994 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154601 versus 122380 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 versus 420.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 versus 4156.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 versus 32.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 versus 162.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 versus 1895.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 versus 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 versus 22050 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Environ 64% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 230 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3714 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22848 | 19406 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1036 | 994 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154601 | 122380 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 420.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 4156.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 32.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 162.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1895.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11163 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA102 | GA104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 12 Apr 2021 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 65 | 105 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 6144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Single-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 241 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A5000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
