NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 10752 versus 5120
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 48 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 versus 161031
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 versus 543.753
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 59.432 versus 51.155
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 versus 17213
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 versus 17213
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 10752 versus 5120 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 16 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 versus 161031 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 versus 543.753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 versus 51.155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 versus 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 versus 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1860 MHz
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 625.0 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- 6.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26851 versus 4237
- 12.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1047 versus 86
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 189.702
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 2347.314
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20908 versus 17833
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1860 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 625.0 GTexel/s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26851 versus 4237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 versus 86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 189.702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 2347.314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3712 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20908 versus 17833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 26851 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 1047 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 | 161031 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | 543.753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | 51.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | 320.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | 2566.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 20908 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A6000 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Nom de code | GA102 | Navi 21 |
Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 94 | 70 |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10752 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 26800 million |
Unités de Compute | 80 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Triple-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 700 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 48 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |