NVIDIA Tesla P4 versus AMD Radeon R9 280
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla P4 and AMD Radeon R9 280 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1063 MHz versus 933 MHz
- Environ 63% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 170.1 GTexel / s versus 104.5 GTexel / s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1792
- Environ 63% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,443 gflops versus 3,344 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8768 versus 5563
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 versus 67.829
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 versus 1266.685
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 versus 6.495
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 versus 79.909
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 versus 365.384
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 versus 7957
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 versus 7957
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 versus 4 March 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz versus 933 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s versus 104.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 1792 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops versus 3,344 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 200 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 versus 5563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 versus 67.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 versus 1266.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 versus 6.495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 versus 79.909 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 versus 365.384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 versus 7957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 versus 7957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 3337 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 665 versus 389
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 versus 389 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 | 5563 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 665 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 67.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1266.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 6.495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 79.909 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 365.384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 7957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 7957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2009 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla P4 | AMD Radeon R9 280 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP104 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 | 4 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 355 | 423 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | 3,344 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s | 104.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 4,313 million |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 275 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla P4 avec des autres
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
