NVIDIA Tesla T4 versus AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla T4 and AMD Radeon R9 Fury pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 52% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 20x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 versus 9592
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 53724
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 13.082
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 789.536
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 10116
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 10116
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 versus 10 July 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 versus 9592 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 53724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 13.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 789.536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 10116 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 versus 596
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 140.274 versus 127.622
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3595.432 versus 3026.812
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 132.701 versus 119.936
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 1781
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 1781
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 versus 596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 versus 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 versus 3026.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 versus 119.936 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 1781 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 | 9592 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 53724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 140.274 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 3595.432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 13.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 132.701 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 789.536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Fiji |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 | 10 July 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 263 | 277 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
| Prix maintenant | $399.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 56 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 7,168 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
| Stream Processors | 3584 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla T4 avec des autres
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
