Intel HD Graphics 530 versus AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 530 and AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 7 GTexel / s
- Environ 44% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 403.2 gflops versus 280.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 1 GB
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 versus 263
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 versus 174
- 5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 versus 872
- 15.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 2.021
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 versus 104.327
- 7.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 0.239
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 versus 5.628
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 versus 23.365
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 versus 672
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 versus 1078
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 2093
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 versus 672
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 versus 1078
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 2093
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 7 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops versus 280.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 versus 263 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 versus 174 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 versus 872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 2.021 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 versus 104.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 0.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 versus 5.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 versus 23.365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 versus 672 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 versus 1078 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 2093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 versus 672 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 versus 1078 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 2093 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 875 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 6.7x plus de pipelines: 160 versus 24
| Vitesse du noyau | 875 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 160 versus 24 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 263 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 174 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 2.021 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 104.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 0.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 5.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 23.365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 672 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 1078 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 2093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 672 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 1078 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 2093 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | Caicos |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1248 | 1541 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 280.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 160 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 370 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 530 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon 620
