NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1188 MHz versus 1085 MHz
Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 49.2 billion / sec versus 43.4 GTexel / s
Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
Environ 31% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,825 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6.6 GB/s versus 5.4 GB/s
Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5340 versus 3901
Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 641 versus 521
Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16728 versus 11526
Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 60.473 versus 42.463
Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 758.865 versus 642.715
Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.279 versus 2.933
Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.738 versus 26.532
Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 231.508 versus 133.458
Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 versus 4843
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3329
Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 versus 4843
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3329

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	20 August 2015 versus 18 February 2014
Vitesse du noyau	1024 MHz versus 1020 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1188 MHz versus 1085 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	49.2 billion / sec versus 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 versus 640
Performance á point flottant	1,825 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
Vitesse de mémoire	6.6 GB/s versus 5.4 GB/s
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	5340 versus 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	641 versus 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	16728 versus 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	60.473 versus 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	758.865 versus 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.279 versus 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	29.738 versus 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	231.508 versus 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6803 versus 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3697 versus 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 versus 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6803 versus 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3697 versus 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 versus 3329

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 90 Watt
Environ 11% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 117 versus 105

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt versus 90 Watt
Référence
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	117 versus 105

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5340

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

641

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

16728

11526

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

60.473

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

758.865

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.279

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.738

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

231.508

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6803

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3697

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6803

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3697

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

105

117

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	5340	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	641	521
Geekbench - OpenCL	16728	11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	60.473	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	758.865	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.279	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	29.738	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	231.508	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6803	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3697	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6803	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3697	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	105	117

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell
Nom de code	GM206	GM107
Date de sortie	20 August 2015	18 February 2014
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$159	$149
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	547	707
Prix maintenant	$194.44	$299.01
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	30.06	15.02
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1188 MHz	1085 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1024 MHz	1020 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	768	640
Performance á point flottant	1,825 gflops	1,389 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	640
Taux de remplissage de la texture	49.2 billion / sec	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	90 Watt	60 Watt
Compte de transistor	2,940 million	1,870 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI	Internal	Internal
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Résolution VGA maximale	2048x1536	2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
HDMI
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Hauteur	4.376" (11.1 cm)	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	7.938" (20.2 cm)	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	350 Watt
Options SLI	2x
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 6-pins	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	105.6 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	6.6 GB/s	5.4 GB/s
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround
3D Gaming
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
FXAA
TXAA