NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 49.2 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
Around 31% better floating-point performance: 1,825 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6.6 GB/s vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5340 vs 3901
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 641 vs 521
Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16728 vs 11526
Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 60.473 vs 42.463
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 758.865 vs 642.715
Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.279 vs 2.933
Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.738 vs 26.532
Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 231.508 vs 133.458
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 vs 4843
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3329
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 vs 4843
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3329

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	20 August 2015 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed	1024 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1188 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate	49.2 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Floating-point performance	1,825 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Memory clock speed	6.6 GB/s vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5340 vs 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	641 vs 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	16728 vs 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	60.473 vs 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	758.865 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.279 vs 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	29.738 vs 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	231.508 vs 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6803 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3697 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6803 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3697 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 90 Watt
Around 11% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 117 vs 105

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 90 Watt
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	117 vs 105

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5340

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

641

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

16728

11526

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

60.473

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

758.865

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.279

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.738

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

231.508

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6803

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3697

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6803

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3697

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

105

117

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	5340	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	641	521
Geekbench - OpenCL	16728	11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	60.473	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	758.865	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.279	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	29.738	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	231.508	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6803	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3697	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6803	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3697	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	105	117

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GM206	GM107
Launch date	20 August 2015	18 February 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	$149
Place in performance rating	547	707
Price now	$194.44	$299.01
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	30.06	15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1188 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	1020 MHz
CUDA cores	768	640
Floating-point performance	1,825 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	640
Texture fill rate	49.2 billion / sec	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	90 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	Internal
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	7.938" (20.2 cm)	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
SLI options	2x
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pins	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	105.6 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.6 GB/s	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround
3D Gaming
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
FXAA
TXAA