Intel HD Graphics 520 vs Intel HD Graphics 5500
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel HD Graphics 520 und Intel HD Graphics 5500 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 520
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 0 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- 3x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 300 MHz vs 100 MHz
- Etwa 11% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1050 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 594
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 vs 2262
- 6.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 3.422
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 vs 781
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 754
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 1397
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 vs 781
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 754
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 1397
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 vs 233
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2015 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz vs 100 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1050 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 vs 594 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 vs 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 vs 3.422 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 vs 233 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 209
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.811 vs 143.083
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 vs 209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 vs 143.083 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 594 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 230 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 195.811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 233 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Generation 9.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Codename | Skylake GT2 | Broadwell GT2 |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1381 | 1478 |
| Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1050 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 24 | 24 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | 1,300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Speichertyp | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | 1 |
Technologien |
||
| Quick Sync | ||


