Intel HD Graphics 520 versus Intel HD Graphics 5500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and Intel HD Graphics 5500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 300 MHz versus 100 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 950 MHz
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 versus 594
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 versus 2262
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 3.422
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 versus 781
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 versus 754
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 versus 1397
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 versus 781
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 versus 754
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 versus 1397
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 versus 233
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 5 September 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz versus 100 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 950 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 versus 594 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 versus 2262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 3.422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 versus 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 versus 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 1397 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 versus 233 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 versus 209
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.811 versus 143.083
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 versus 209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 versus 143.083 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 594 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 230 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 2262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 3.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 195.811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 1397 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 233 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | Broadwell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 1478 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 950 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 100 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |