Intel HD Graphics 520 vs Intel HD Graphics 5500

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and Intel HD Graphics 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 3x more core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 100 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 950 MHz
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 594
• Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 vs 2262
• 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 3.422
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 vs 781
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 754
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 1397
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 vs 781
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 754
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 1397
• Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 vs 233

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500

• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 209
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.811 vs 143.083

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	864 594
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 230
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3993 2262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 3.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.083 195.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 781
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 781
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 1397
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	326 233

Compare specifications (specs)