NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Intel HD Graphics 630
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q und Intel HD Graphics 630 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 4 Monat(e) später
- 3.3x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1152 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Etwa 23% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1417 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 2.5x mehr Texturfüllrate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 32x mehr Leitungssysteme: 768 vs 24
- 4.9x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,177 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5320 vs 1114
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 268
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19914 vs 4554
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.188 vs 27.948
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 312.246
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 1.795
- 4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 20.404
- 9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 32.567
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 1859
- Etwa 84% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 vs 1945
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 1859
- Etwa 84% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 vs 1945
- 5.7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 vs 388
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 3 January 2018 vs 30 August 2016 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1152 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1417 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 68.02 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 768 vs 24 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,177 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 vs 1114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 vs 268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19914 vs 4554 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 vs 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 vs 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 vs 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 vs 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 vs 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 vs 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 vs 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 vs 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 vs 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 vs 388 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 630
- 5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 16x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 64 GB vs 4 GB
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 | 1114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 | 268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19914 | 4554 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 | 388 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
Codename | GP107 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Startdatum | 3 January 2018 | 30 August 2016 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 505 | 1216 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1417 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1152 MHz | 350 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,177 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 768 | 24 |
Texturfüllrate | 68.02 GTexel / s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,300 million | 189 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 112.1 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7008 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 1 |
Technologien |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |