NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q versus Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and Intel HD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 3.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1152 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1417 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 68.02 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s
- 32x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 24
- 4.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,177 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- 4.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5320 versus 1114
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 versus 268
- 4.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19914 versus 4554
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.188 versus 27.948
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 versus 312.246
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 versus 1.795
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 versus 20.404
- 9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 versus 32.567
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 versus 1859
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 versus 1945
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 versus 1859
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 versus 1945
- 5.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 versus 388
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 versus 30 August 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.02 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,177 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 versus 1114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 versus 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19914 versus 4554 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 versus 27.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 versus 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 versus 1.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 versus 20.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 versus 32.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 versus 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 versus 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 versus 388 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 4 GB
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 4 GB |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 | 1114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 | 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19914 | 4554 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | 27.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | 1.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | 20.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | 32.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 | 388 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | GP107 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 | 30 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 505 | 1216 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,177 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 24 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.02 GTexel / s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9650M GS
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W7000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Sky 500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q
