NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Intel HD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and Intel HD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 3.3x more core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
• 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
• 4.9x better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5320 vs 1114
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 268
• 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19914 vs 4554
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.188 vs 27.948
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 312.246
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 1.795
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 20.404
• 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 32.567
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 1859
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 vs 1945
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 1859
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 vs 1945
• 5.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 vs 388

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5320 1114
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	345 268
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19914 4554
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.188 27.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1159.046 312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.507 1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.067 20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.638 32.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2219 388

Compare specifications (specs)