NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q und NVIDIA TITAN V Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 4 Monat(e) später
- 275.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s
- 4.2x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 vs 20.669
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 23 April 2019 vs 7 December 2017 |
Texturfüllrate | 128.2 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 vs 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3716 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA TITAN V
- Etwa 5% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1200 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Etwa 9% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1455 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- 3.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 5120 vs 1536
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Etwa 13% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 vs 8626
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 364
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 vs 53834
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 195.93
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3583.136 vs 1919.95
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 14.6
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 492.867
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15401 vs 12301
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3358
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15401 vs 12301
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3358
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13111 vs 4905
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1200 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1455 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 5120 vs 1536 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19884 vs 8626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 vs 364 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150662 vs 53834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 vs 195.93 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 vs 1919.95 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 14.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 492.867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 vs 12301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 vs 12301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13111 vs 4905 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 | 19884 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 868 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 150662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 | 13111 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Volta |
Codename | TU116 | GV100 |
Startdatum | 23 April 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 333 | 149 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1335 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1140 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1536 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 128.2 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6600 million | 21,100 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 14,899 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 288.0 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | 3072 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1700 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | HBM2 |