NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q versus NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN V pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 128.2 GTexel/s versus 465.6 GTexel / s
- 4.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 versus 20.669
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 7 December 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s versus 465.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 versus 20.669 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN V
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 1140 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1455 MHz versus 1335 MHz
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 1536
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1700 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 versus 8625
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 versus 364
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 versus 53834
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 versus 195.93
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3583.136 versus 1919.95
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 versus 14.6
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 versus 492.867
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15401 versus 12301
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 versus 3358
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15401 versus 12301
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 versus 3358
- 2.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13111 versus 4912
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 1140 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz versus 1335 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 1536 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1700 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19884 versus 8625 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 versus 364 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 150662 versus 53834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 versus 195.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 versus 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 versus 14.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 versus 492.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 versus 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 versus 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 versus 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13111 versus 4912 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8625 | 19884 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 868 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 150662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 270.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 30.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 20.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 1504.373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 4193 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4912 | 13111 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU116 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 333 | 149 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 3072 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1700 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
