NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q und NVIDIA TITAN V Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- 2.2x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- 5.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 111.023 vs 20.669
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 15401
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3716
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 4193
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 15401
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3716
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 4193
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 29 January 2019 vs 7 December 2017 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 vs 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 4193 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA TITAN V
- Etwa 36% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1200 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Etwa 23% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1455 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- 2.2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 5120 vs 2304
- Etwa 69% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 vs 11744
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 483
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 vs 78224
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 168.08
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3583.136 vs 1935.102
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 22.794
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1001.496
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13111 vs 6839
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1200 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1455 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 5120 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19884 vs 11744 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 vs 483 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150662 vs 78224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 vs 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 vs 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 22.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 1001.496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13111 vs 6839 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11744 | 19884 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 868 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78224 | 150662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6839 | 13111 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Volta |
Codename | TU106 | GV100 |
Startdatum | 29 January 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 178 | 149 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1185 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 885 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 2304 | 5120 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10,800 million | 21,100 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 14,899 gflops | |
Texturfüllrate | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | 3072 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 652.8 GB / s |