NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA NVS 5400M und NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 35% höhere Texturfüllrate: 10.56 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
- Etwa 2% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 253.4 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
- 2.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 620 vs 536
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 186 vs 176
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2127 vs 2012
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 vs 4.25
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1069 vs 929
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 1210
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 1524
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1069 vs 929
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 1210
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 1524
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 June 2012 vs 15 January 2011 |
| Texturfüllrate | 10.56 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 253.4 gflops vs 249.6 gflops |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 620 vs 536 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 vs 176 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2127 vs 2012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 vs 4.25 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 vs 929 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 vs 1210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 vs 1524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 vs 929 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 vs 1210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 vs 1524 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Etwa 97% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1300 MHz vs 660 MHz
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1300 MHz vs 660 MHz |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 620 | 536 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 | 176 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2127 | 2012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 | 4.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.696 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 | 929 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 | 1210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 | 1524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 | 929 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 | 1210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 | 1524 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA NVS 5400M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Fermi | Fermi |
| Codename | GF108 | GF106 |
| Startdatum | 1 June 2012 | 15 January 2011 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1439 | 1441 |
| Typ | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 660 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 253.4 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 96 | 96 |
| Texturfüllrate | 10.56 GTexel / s | 7.8 billion / sec |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 585 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA-Kerne | 96 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop-Größe | medium sized | large |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Speichertyp | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| Optimus | ||
