NVIDIA NVS 5400M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA NVS 5400M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 10.56 GTexel / s versus 7.8 billion / sec
- Environ 2% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 249.6 gflops
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 624 versus 536
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 versus 176
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2101 versus 2012
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 versus 4.25
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1069 versus 929
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 versus 1210
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 versus 1524
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1069 versus 929
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 versus 1210
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 versus 1524
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2012 versus 15 January 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.56 GTexel / s versus 7.8 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 249.6 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 624 versus 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 versus 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2101 versus 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 versus 4.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 versus 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 versus 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 versus 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 versus 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 versus 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 versus 1524 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Environ 97% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1300 MHz versus 660 MHz
Vitesse du noyau | 1300 MHz versus 660 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 624 | 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2101 | 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 | 4.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 | 1524 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA NVS 5400M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2012 | 15 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1438 | 1440 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 660 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.56 GTexel / s | 7.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,170 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus |