NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro K610M und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro K610M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 10 Monat(e) später
- 4.7x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 30 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 433.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 2600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Startdatum | 23 July 2013 vs 6 September 2012 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 2600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 5x mehr Texturfüllrate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 15.68 GTexel / s
- 5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 960 vs 192
- 5.3x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,981 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 713
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 218
- 5.7x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 1995
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 182.093
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 vs 20.881
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 1123
- Etwa 64% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 2253
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3195
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 1123
- Etwa 64% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 2253
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3195
| Spezifikationen | |
| Texturfüllrate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 960 vs 192 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,981 gflops vs 376.3 gflops |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 vs 713 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 218 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 vs 1995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 vs 182.093 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 vs 20.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 2253 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 2253 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3195 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 713 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1995 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.881 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1123 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1123 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 | 3365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Codename | GK208 | GK106 |
| Startdatum | 23 July 2013 | 6 September 2012 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $229.99 | $229 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1300 | 740 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $75 | $349.99 |
| Typ | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 11.43 | 14.35 |
Technische Info |
||
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 980 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 376.3 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 192 | 960 |
| Texturfüllrate | 15.68 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1270 Million | 2,540 million |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1033 MHz | |
| CUDA-Kerne | 960 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Länge | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | One 6-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 20.8 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 2600 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche NVIDIA Quadro K610M mit anderen
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000M
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920M
