NVIDIA Quadro K610M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K610M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K610M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- 4.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 433.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2600 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 6 September 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 78.4 billion / sec versus 15.68 GTexel / s
- 5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 192
- 5.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,981 gflops versus 376.3 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 5.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 713
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 218
- 5.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 versus 1995
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 182.093
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 versus 20.881
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 versus 1123
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 2253
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 versus 3195
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 versus 1123
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 2253
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 versus 3195
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec versus 15.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops versus 376.3 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 713 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 versus 1995 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 182.093 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 versus 20.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 versus 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 versus 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3195 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 713 | 4017 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 487 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1995 | 11364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 | 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.881 | 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1123 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1123 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 | 3365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK208 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 6 September 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229.99 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1300 | 740 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | $349.99 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.43 | 14.35 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 980 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 376.3 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.68 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 140 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1270 Million | 2,540 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 20.8 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |