NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K610M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 433.3x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 6 September 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 5x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 15.68 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 960 vs 192
- 5.3x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 713
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 218
- 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 1995
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 182.093
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 vs 20.881
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 1123
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 2253
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3195
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 1123
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 2253
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3195
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops vs 376.3 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 vs 713 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 218 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 vs 1995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 vs 182.093 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 vs 20.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 2253 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 2253 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3195 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 713 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1995 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.881 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1123 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1123 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 | 3365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GK208 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 6 September 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229.99 | $229 |
| Place in performance rating | 1300 | 740 |
| Price now | $75 | $349.99 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.43 | 14.35 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 376.3 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 960 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1270 Million | 2,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 20.8 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K610M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000M
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920M
