NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro M4000M und NVIDIA Quadro M5000M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
- Etwa 4% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1051 MHz vs 1013 MHz
- Etwa 20% höhere Texturfüllrate: 93.6 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
- Etwa 20% höhere Leitungssysteme: 1,536 vs 1,280
- Etwa 20% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,995 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7012 vs 6146
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 413
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22785 vs 19918
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 95.613 vs 81.104
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1341.18 vs 1235.338
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.869 vs 6.157
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.683 vs 68.443
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 366.321 vs 251.464
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9399 vs 7602
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2749
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3093
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9399 vs 7602
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2749
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3093
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1051 MHz vs 1013 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 93.6 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1,536 vs 1,280 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,995 gflops vs 2,496 gflops |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7012 vs 6146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 vs 413 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22785 vs 19918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 95.613 vs 81.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1341.18 vs 1235.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.869 vs 6.157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.683 vs 68.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 366.321 vs 251.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9399 vs 7602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 2749 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9399 vs 7602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 2749 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3093 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | NVIDIA Quadro M5000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6146 | 7012 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 471 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19918 | 22785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 | 95.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 | 1341.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 | 6.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.443 | 83.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 | 366.321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 | 9399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 | 9399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | NVIDIA Quadro M5000M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Codename | GM204 | GM204 |
Startdatum | 18 August 2015 | 18 August 2015 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 551 | 455 |
Typ | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1013 MHz | 1051 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 975 MHz | 975 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,496 gflops | 2,995 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 1,280 | 1,536 |
Texturfüllrate | 78 GTexel / s | 93.6 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,200 million | 5,200 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | large | large |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 160 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |