NVIDIA Quadro M4000M versus NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and NVIDIA Quadro M5000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

versus

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1051 MHz versus 1013 MHz
Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 93.6 GTexel / s versus 78 GTexel / s
Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 1,536 versus 1,280
Environ 20% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,995 gflops versus 2,496 gflops
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7012 versus 6146
Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 versus 413
Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22785 versus 19918
Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 95.613 versus 81.104
Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1341.18 versus 1235.338
Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.869 versus 6.157
Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.683 versus 68.443
Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 366.321 versus 251.464
Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9399 versus 7602
Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 2749
Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 3093
Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9399 versus 7602
Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 2749
Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 3093

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	1051 MHz versus 1013 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	93.6 GTexel / s versus 78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1,536 versus 1,280
Performance á point flottant	2,995 gflops versus 2,496 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	8 GB versus 4 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	7012 versus 6146
PassMark - G2D Mark	471 versus 413
Geekbench - OpenCL	22785 versus 19918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	95.613 versus 81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1341.18 versus 1235.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.869 versus 6.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	83.683 versus 68.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	366.321 versus 251.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9399 versus 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 versus 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339 versus 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9399 versus 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 versus 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339 versus 3093

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6146

7012

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

413

471

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

19918

22785

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

81.104

95.613

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1235.338

1341.18

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.157

6.869

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

68.443

83.683

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

251.464

366.321

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7602

9399

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2749

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3093

3339

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7602

9399

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2749

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3093

3339

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro M4000M	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	6146	7012
PassMark - G2D Mark	413	471
Geekbench - OpenCL	19918	22785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	81.104	95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1235.338	1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.157	6.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	68.443	83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	251.464	366.321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7602	9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2749	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3093	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7602	9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2749	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3093	3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro M4000M	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Nom de code	GM204	GM204
Date de sortie	18 August 2015	18 August 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	551	455
Genre	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1013 MHz	1051 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	975 MHz	975 MHz
Performance á point flottant	2,496 gflops	2,995 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1,280	1,536
Taux de remplissage de la texture	78 GTexel / s	93.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	100 Watt
Compte de transistor	5,200 million	5,200 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	1.2
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Taille du laptop	large	large
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0	5.0
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	160 GB / s	160 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 Bit	256 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz	5012 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus