AMD FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V3900 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V3900

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 480 vs 336
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1311 vs 296
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1631 vs 475
• 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 657
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1311 vs 296
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1631 vs 475
• 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 657

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 32.2 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 199 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 vs 640
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 237
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 1564
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 4.646
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 vs 279.435
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 vs 0.468
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 vs 13.784
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 vs 58.58

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro V3900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	640 1864
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	237 358
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1564 5696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.646 14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	279.435 533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.468 1.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.784 31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.58 66.187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1311 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1631 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1311 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1631 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 657

Compare specifications (specs)