AMD FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V3900 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V3900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 480 vs 336
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1311 vs 296
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1631 vs 475
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 657
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1311 vs 296
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1631 vs 475
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 657
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2012 vs 28 June 2011 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Pipelines | 480 vs 336 |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1311 vs 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 vs 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1311 vs 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 vs 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 657 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 32.2 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 199 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 vs 640
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 236
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 1564
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 4.646
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 vs 279.435
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 vs 0.468
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 vs 13.784
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 vs 58.58
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 772.8 gflops vs 624.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 199 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 vs 640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 vs 236 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 vs 1564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 vs 4.646 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 vs 279.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 vs 0.468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 vs 13.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 vs 58.58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V3900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V3900 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 640 | 1864 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 358 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1564 | 5696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.646 | 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.435 | 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.468 | 1.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.784 | 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 58.58 | 66.187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1311 | 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1311 | 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 657 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V3900 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Turks | GF114 |
Launch date | 7 February 2012 | 28 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1347 | 1349 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 772.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 32.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 199 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Form factor | Half Height / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28 GB / s | 72.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |