AMD FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V3900 and NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V3900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 523 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 480 vs 48
- 6.2x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 640 vs 255
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 237 vs 169
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1564 vs 758
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1631 vs 1254
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1723
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1631 vs 1254
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1723
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2012 vs 29 September 2011 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 523 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 100.42 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1796 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 640 vs 255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 vs 169 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1564 vs 758 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 vs 1254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 vs 1254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1723 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 199 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 199 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V3900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V3900 | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 640 | 255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 | 169 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1564 | 758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.435 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.468 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 58.58 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 | 1254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 | 1254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1723 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V3900 | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Turks | GF119 |
Launch date | 7 February 2012 | 29 September 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1347 | 1348 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 523 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 100.42 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 4.18 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 199 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Form factor | Half Height / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28 GB / s | 14.37 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1796 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |