AMD FirePro V4900 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V4900 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 15x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 990 vs 66
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 174
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 vs 1 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 990 vs 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 vs 174 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V4900
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V4900 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 990 | 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1928 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 392.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.818 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V4900 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
Code name | Turks | RS880 |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 | 1 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 980 | 982 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 380 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 9 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |