AMD FirePro V4900 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V4900 and ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 525 MHz
- 9.1x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 480 vs 40
- 18.3x better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 42 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 8.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 990 vs 114
- 18.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 426
- 18.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 426
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 525 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops vs 42 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 990 vs 114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 vs 426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 vs 426 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 346 vs 312
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 346 vs 312 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V4900
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V4900 | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 990 | 114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 346 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 392.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.818 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 | 426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 | 426 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V4900 | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
Code name | Turks | RV610 |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 952 | 954 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 525 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | 42 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 2.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |