AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs AMD FirePro V5900

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and AMD FirePro V5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• Around 93% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1616 vs 1265
• 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 2880
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 vs 8.167
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.187 vs 0.772
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.837 vs 20.064
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.407 vs 66.259
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 1713
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 1713

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900

• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 338
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 409.102 vs 283.116
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2091 vs 1228
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5078 vs 1705
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2091 vs 1228
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5078 vs 1705

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V5900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1616 1265
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	338 355
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11041 2880
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.109 8.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	283.116 409.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.187 0.772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.837 20.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.407 66.259
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3265 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 2091
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 5078
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3265 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 2091
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 5078

Compare specifications (specs)