AMD Radeon HD 6570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.8x more pipelines: 480 vs 128
- Around 61% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 387.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 54
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2011 vs 4 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 387.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 vs 54 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- 3x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 591 vs 559
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3108 vs 1044
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2716
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3108 vs 1044
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 591 vs 559 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3108 vs 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3108 vs 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 | 591 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 54 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Thames | G92B |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2011 | 4 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $199 |
| Place in performance rating | 1426 | 1021 |
| Price now | $49.99 | $114.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | 9.91 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 387.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 128 |
| Stream Processors | 480 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 47.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 754 million |
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 70.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6570 with others
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5670
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7560D
