AMD Radeon HD 7570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
• Around 4% better floating-point performance: 624 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
• Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 106 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 vs 27.656
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3325
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 vs 614
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 vs 256
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 vs 1550
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 vs 4.874
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 302.509 vs 259.769
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.965 vs 0.487
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.925 vs 14.033
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 vs 1389
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 2724
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 vs 1389
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 2724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	614 1322
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	256 310
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1550 4907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.874 14.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	259.769 302.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.487 0.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.033 14.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.396 27.656
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1389 2160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2724 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1389 2160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2724 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3325

Compare specifications (specs)