AMD Radeon HD 7570 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7570 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 625 MHz
• 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
• Around 30% better floating-point performance: 624 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 62 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.769 vs 258.26
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.033 vs 13.688
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 vs 19.02
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 1682
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2668
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 1682
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 63% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 614
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 256
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3879 vs 1550
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.229 vs 4.874
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 vs 0.487
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1600 vs 1389
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1600 vs 1389

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	614 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	256 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1550 3879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.874 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	259.769 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.487 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.033 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.396 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1389 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2724 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1389 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2724 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 2668

Compare specifications (specs)