AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs AMD FirePro W4100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD FirePro W4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 47% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 630 MHz
• Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 20.16 GTexel / s
• Around 93% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 645.1 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1871 vs 1504
• Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10293 vs 5447
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.848 vs 15.65
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.268 vs 1.631
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.988 vs 31.533
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 75.309
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 1951
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3399
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1620
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 1951
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3399
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1620

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 453 vs 387
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 vs 438.581

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1871 1504
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	387 453
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10293 5447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.848 15.65
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	438.581 538.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.268 1.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.988 31.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.235 75.309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 1620
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 1620

Compare specifications (specs)