AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon HD 6870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 900 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 151 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10277 vs 4950
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.848 vs 16.41
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.268 vs 1.346
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.988 vs 45.514
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 21 October 2010 |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10277 vs 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 vs 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 vs 1.346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 vs 45.514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6870
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
- 2.2x more pipelines: 1120 vs 512
- Around 62% better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2209 vs 1867
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 389
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 857.798 vs 438.581
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.41 vs 139.235
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4238 vs 3241
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4238 vs 3241
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1120 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops vs 1,248 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2209 vs 1867 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 vs 438.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 vs 139.235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4238 vs 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4238 vs 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3709 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1867 | 2209 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10277 | 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 | 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 | 857.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 | 1.346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 | 45.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 | 184.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Lexa | Barts |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 21 October 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $239 |
Place in performance rating | 820 | 817 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1120 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 220 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |