AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 55% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10246 vs 7892
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 2097
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3127
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 2097
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10246 vs 7892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 vs 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 vs 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3127 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3350
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3350
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1834 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 393 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10246 | 7892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 | 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 6862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 | 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 6862 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | Oland |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Place in performance rating | 831 | 832 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 806.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 with others
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210E
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100 vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 770
